An emergency economic meeting was held in Abuja as rising food prices, electricity tariffs and transport costs triggered strong concern among state governments and federal economic managers. The closed-door session, which took place at the NEC Hall inside the Presidential Villa, was attended by the Vice President, the 36 state governors, Finance Minister Wale Edun, Minister of Power Adebayo Adelabu, Central Bank Governor Olayemi Cardoso. It also included senior officials from federal economic agencies. The gathering started shortly after 11:00 a.m., with governors arriving in convoys and taking their seats according to geopolitical zones. The Chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, who convened the meeting, opened discussions by presenting reports from state executive councils highlighting worsening inflation and reduced household purchasing power. Representatives from each zone — North-East, North-West, North-Central, South-East, South-West and South-South — also delivered brief updates on food supply challenges and market price movements. During the session, Finance Minister Wale Edun addressed the room, explaining the federal government’s latest fiscal measures aimed at stabilizing the economy, including plans for targeted support to vulnerable households and increased monitoring of essential commodity prices. He told the governors that “inflation control requires joint federal-state action,” emphasizing coordinated interventions in agriculture and distribution networks. The Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, followed with a presentation on electricity supply constraints and recent grid instability. He noted that several power assets were undergoing repairs and assured the governors that ongoing reforms would reduce outages over the next quarter. Governors from Kaduna, Cross River, Kano, Lagos, and Enugu asked direct questions about tariff reviews and rural electrification timelines, prompting further clarifications from the technical advisers accompanying the minister. CBN Governor Olayemi Cardoso spoke about monetary pressures contributing to inflation, explaining steps taken to stabilize the naira and regulate foreign exchange flows. He emphasized that restoring confidence in the financial system would support price reduction across key sectors. Members of the National Economic Council nodded in agreement as he detailed forthcoming policy adjustments. Civil society observers invited to the sidelines of the meeting provided short commentaries, calling for transparency and immediate rollout of state-level relief initiatives. Governors also discussed joint procurement plans for fertilizer and grain distribution, aiming to boost agricultural output before the planting season. At the end of the meeting, the Vice President briefed journalists waiting outside, telling them that federal and state governments had agreed on a unified response strategy that would be implemented “without delay.” Several governors who spoke with the press described the gathering as productive and said Nigerians would begin to see improvements once the measures take effect.

Nigeria’s rising food inflation took centre stage on Tuesday as state governors met behind closed doors at the Nigerian Governors’ Forum Secretariat in Abuja. They were joined by the Minister of Finance, the Governor of the Central Bank, senior security chiefs, and members of the National Economic Council. The meeting began shortly after 11:00 a.m. and lasted more than three hours, drawing governors from all six geopolitical zones, including those of Kaduna, Lagos, Oyo, Borno, Rivers and Enugu. The session was chaired by the Chairman of the Governors’ Forum, who sat at the top of the table flanked by the Minister of Finance and the CBN Governor. Also present were the Minister of Agriculture, the National Security Adviser, and representatives of the military and police responsible for securing major food-producing regions. Several senior economic advisers, state commissioners of finance, and officials from the Bureau of Statistics were also in the hall. During the briefing phase, the Minister of Finance addressed the gathering first, saying the latest figures showed “an alarming upward shift in staple prices,” with states in the North-West and North-East facing the sharpest spikes due to insecurity and transport disruption. The CBN Governor, who followed, spoke about interventions aimed at stabilizing the naira and easing agricultural credit. He warned that without coordinated action between federal and state structures, “the inflation curve may remain stubborn for the next quarter.” Governors took turns raising concerns. The Governor of Borno explained how banditry and insurgency were preventing farmers from accessing farmlands, while the Governor of Oyo highlighted the rising cost of transportation and its direct effect on market prices. The Lagos Governor expressed worry over food imports becoming costlier, stressing the need for better marine security and local production. Security chiefs in the room confirmed that troops had been deployed to protect key farming belts, though they admitted the efforts had been stretched by simultaneous crises in multiple states. At one point, the Governor of Kaduna made an emotional appeal, telling the room that thousands of farmers had abandoned fields this season out of fear. Agricultural cooperatives present as observers nodded in agreement as he spoke. Representatives of market unions also attended the meeting and shared firsthand reports of price volatility across major state markets. After internal deliberations, the Chairman of the Forum addressed journalists waiting outside the hall. He said the governors had agreed on an emergency food-stability plan that would include market monitoring teams, additional security support for farming communities, improved transportation corridors, and a request for financial intervention from the federal government. The Minister of Agriculture, in a separate briefing, promised immediate action to fast-track support for small-scale farmers ahead of the next planting season. For millions of Nigerians struggling with rising food prices, the meeting signals a new level of urgency from government leaders. Whether the resolutions translate into relief remains to be seen, but the mood among governors and federal officials suggested that the crisis can no longer be managed with routine measures.

President Bola Tinubu on Monday held an emergency meeting with Nigeria’s top energy regulators and service chiefs at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, after a nationwide power grid collapse plunged multiple states into blackout overnight. The meeting, which started around 11:30 a.m. inside the Council Chamber, was attended by the Minister of Power, Chief Adebayo Adelabu; the Group Managing Director of the Transmission Company; senior engineers from the National Control Centre; and security officials from the Office of the National Security Adviser. Also present were the Chief of Defence Staff, General Christopher Musa; the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun; and senior officers responsible for protecting critical national infrastructure. The Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, and the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, joined the session as the technical reports were presented. During the briefing, the Minister of Power explained that the grid collapsed at about 2:19 a.m. following what he described as “a sudden frequency imbalance” in the system. He outlined the states affected, listed ongoing repair efforts and identified substations under pressure. The President listened as transmission experts used digital screens to illustrate the fault sequence. A senior engineer from the Transmission Company told attendees that the incident was “one of the most disruptive drops in recent months.” The President, speaking firmly, ordered a full investigation to uncover the cause of the repeated collapses, directing the Ministry of Power to submit a written report within 72 hours. He also instructed the Inspector-General of Police and the Chief of Defence Staff to increase surveillance on power installations, warning that sabotage could not be ruled out until intelligence assessments were completed. “National infrastructure must not continue to fail without accountability,” he told those in the room. After the meeting, the Minister of Power addressed journalists stationed at the Villa’s press corridor. He assured Nigerians that partial supply had already been restored in several states and promised that engineers were working round the clock to stabilize the grid. The National Security Adviser’s representative also spoke briefly, saying security agencies had widened monitoring of transmission lines, substations, and load centres across the country. Reaction across the country has been swift. Industry experts, labour groups and citizens online expressed frustration that grid collapses remain frequent despite previous interventions. Some energy analysts said the involvement of service chiefs signalled a shift in government attitude, treating the grid failure not only as a technical issue but as a potential national security risk. As work continues to stabilize the system, Nigerians wait to see whether the new directives will produce lasting results or simply blend into the long list of previous promises. GistVibes will track every update on the investigation, recovery efforts and public reaction as this situation unfolds.

A former Chief of Defence Staff, General Lucky Irabor, said on Tuesday in Abuja that certain unscrupulous politicians may be helping to bankroll terrorist activities in Nigeria, a claim that has stirred intense public reaction. Speaking at a closed-door security symposium held at the Defence Headquarters, Irabor made the assertion as part of a broader call for reforms and tighter oversight of political financing. At the meeting, Irabor — flanked by the current Defence Minister, senior military commanders, representatives from the National Security Adviser’s office, and heads of intelligence agencies — laid out what he described as “emerging evidence” linking financial flows from unnamed political actors to networks associated with terrorism and insurgency. Also present were high-ranking service chiefs from the Army, Navy and Air Force, as well as top officers of domestic intelligence and anti-terror units. A handful of security analysts and civil society leaders involved in counter-terror financing were invited to observe the session. General Irabor told attendees that the pattern he observed involved “politicians moving funds under the guise of campaign donations or constituency projects,” only for those funds to eventually end up supporting violent extremist groups. He warned that unless political and financial structures are cleansed, “the security challenges we see today will persist regardless of troop deployment.” His comments, he added, should not be interpreted as blanket accusations — but as a call for detailed financial investigation and transparency in how money flows during election cycles. After his remarks, a senior intelligence official echoed the need for urgent action. He noted that while it was too early to name names publicly, intelligence agencies were tracing suspicious transfers and monitoring politicians with unusual spending patterns. The official cautioned that fighting insecurity required more than military operations — it required financial forensics, accountability, and collaboration with financial regulatory bodies. The symposium closed with the Defence Minister vowing to establish a special task force composed of military, intelligence and financial regulatory representatives to probe the allegations. He said the government would engage with lawmakers to push for tighter laws governing political funding and to broaden anti-money-laundering enforcement. Observers at the event described the mood as serious, with many expressing hope that the government would follow through. Civil society leaders present lauded Irabor’s courage in speaking out, but urged caution to ensure investigations remain impartial and evidence-based. For Nigerians concerned with national security, Irabor’s statement marks a potentially significant turning point. If verified and pursued, the revelations could reshape how political financing and counter-terrorism intersect — but also raise questions about political accountability, transparency, and the will to address root causes of violence. GistVibes will continue tracking developments, monitoring leaks from investigations, and reporting any official names, evidence, or follow-up actions.

The Senate has scheduled a screening for General Christopher Musa, the nominee for Defence Minister, on Wednesday at the National Assembly complex in Abuja. The confirmation hearing will begin at 10:00 a.m. in the Senate chamber and will feature members of the Senate Committee on Defence, senior senators across party lines, and security stakeholders invited to observe the process. Those expected to attend include the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Defence, Senator Abdullahi Adamu, other committee members from both ruling and opposition benches, and the Secretary to the Committee. In addition, the Senate President and Deputy Senate President, senior clerks, representatives of the Ministry of Defence, and aides to nominated officers will be present to oversee proceedings. Reporters and civil society observers accredited by the Senate will also cover the hearing. During the screening, senators are expected to quiz General Musa on his military background, his record handling security operations, plans for defence reform, strategies for tackling insurgency and banditry. They will also discuss how he plans to coordinate among the Army, Navy, Air Force, police, and intelligence agencies. If confirmed. The nominee is expected to appear before the panel alongside his legal and administrative aides to answer questions and submit required documentation. A senior Senate aide said preparations are ongoing in the lead-up to Wednesday, with extra seats added in the visitors’ gallery to accommodate observers from security-focused civil society groups and media organizations. The aim, the aide said, is to ensure transparency and public confidence in the confirmation process given the gravity of the security situation in the country. Observers familiar with the process noted that this screening will be closely watched by citizens concerned about national security, especially as recent months have seen spikes in insurgency, kidnappings and communal clashes across several states. If confirmation is successful, Musa will take over as head of the country’s defence apparatus — a role many believe is critical for restoring stability and improving military morale.

In a major shake-up prompted by rising insecurity across the country, the Senate leadership under Senate President Godswill Akpabio has reorganized several key standing committees. This move was announced during a plenary session at the National Assembly complex in Abuja on Wednesday. The reshuffle follows growing pressure on lawmakers to strengthen oversight of security agencies and respond more quickly to escalating violence in states besieged by banditry, kidnapping and communal conflict. During the session, Akpabio — flanked by the Senate’s Deputy President and principal officers — revealed a new distribution of committee chairs and membership. Among those present were senior senators from all regions, including those recently appointed to head committees on Defence, Internal Security, Judiciary, Water Resources and National Emergency. Also at the session were committee clerks, senior legislative aides and representatives from the Senate’s security desk. The outgoing chairmen of numerous committees attended to hand over dossiers and brief the new office holders. According to sources inside the Senate, the defence, and internal security committees were given priority in the reshuffle, with leadership roles assigned to senators considered experienced on security issues. The move reflects growing concern that existing committees lacked the coordination and manpower to effectively supervise security operations in troubled states. Akpabio told senators that with the new setup, “we expect more proactive oversight, timely intervention and fresh energy” toward tackling insecurity nationwide. Some senators who lost committee leadership roles reportedly expressed disappointment, but others said the reshuffle was necessary given the gravity of current security challenges. A few lawmakers, speaking on condition of anonymity, argued that the changes were overdue — saying that past oversight failures had contributed to delayed responses to crises in various states. Analysts watching the move say it may signal a shift in how Nigeria’s legislature deals with security oversight — from ad hoc reactions to more structured engagement. With committees now freshly staffed, responsibility lies with lawmakers to track security agency reform, emergency funding disbursement, and evaluation of police and defence operations across the country. For citizens worried about violence, the reshuffle offers a sliver of hope — but also raises questions about whether political rearrangements are enough without real commitment, resources, and accountability.

Nigeria’s security leadership shifted on Thursday afternoon when Christopher Musa was formally nominated as the country’s next Defence Minister during a high-level briefing at the Council Chamber of the Presidential Villa, Abuja. The meeting, which began shortly after 2:00 p.m., was presided over by the President and attended by some of the most senior figures in Nigeria’s security structure, including the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu; the Chief of Defence Staff, General Musa; the Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant-General Taoreed Lagbaja; the Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Emmanuel Ogalla; the Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshal Hassan Abubakar; and the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun. Also present were the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, and the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila. Senior directors from the Ministry of Defence, including Permanent Secretary Dr. Ibrahim Abubakar Kana, joined the session along with aides from the State House and liaisons from the National Assembly. The outgoing Defence Minister was physically present as well, taking his final bow in front of the personnel he once supervised. Service chiefs took turns presenting field updates and intelligence assessments, outlining ongoing threats, troop morale, and areas requiring reinforcement. After reviewing the reports, the President announced Christopher Musa as the nominee for Minister of Defence, explaining that continuity, discipline and field experience were urgently needed as insecurity continues to test Nigeria’s stability. Speaking outside the Villa after the meeting, Musa told journalists that he considered the nomination “a call to serve with everything I have.” Ribadu also addressed reporters, describing Musa as a soldier whose career has been shaped by dedication to frontline operations across every major security theatre in the country. Lawmakers including Senator Ali Ndume and Honourable Ado Doguwa, who were at the Villa for separate engagements, congratulated Musa when they encountered him near the forecourt and expressed confidence in his leadership capacity. As the nomination heads to the National Assembly, many Nigerians want to know exactly who Christopher Musa is, what shaped him, and why he has become such a central figure in Nigeria’s fight against insecurity. Christopher Musa’s journey through the ranks has spanned decades, beginning as a young officer who served in several battalions across the country. He grew through operational roles at a time when Nigeria faced rising insurgency threats, and his postings took him to some of the most volatile regions in the North-East. Musa led troops during some of the intense phases of the long-running conflict against extremist groups, and colleagues have often described him as a field officer who preferred being physically present at operational zones rather than directing operations from headquarters. One of the missions that strengthened his reputation was his management of counter-insurgency operations in areas where villages were repeatedly attacked by armed groups. Troops under his command credited him for enforcing discipline, ensuring proper supply lines and insisting on intelligence-driven action. He was also part of multiple joint operations involving the Army, Air Force and civilian security volunteers, coordinating strategies that prevented several large-scale attacks in communities across Borno and Yobe. Musa also served in international peacekeeping missions earlier in his career, where he gained exposure to coalition operations, civilian protection protocols and multinational command structures. Officers who worked with him during these missions often cite his calmness under pressure, saying he rarely raised his voice yet demanded strict professionalism from every unit under his supervision. However, his career has not been without controversy. At various times, advocacy groups questioned certain tactics used during operations in conflict zones, especially when civilian populations were at risk. Musa consistently defended his teams by noting that Nigeria’s battles often involve complex terrains where armed groups mix with civilians, making operations delicate and sometimes misunderstood. While these concerns never led to disciplinary actions against him, they remain part of the broader national conversation on balancing security and human rights in conflict regions. His achievements remain significant in military circles. Musa was widely praised for reorganising battalion structures in some of the hardest-hit regions, improving troop rotations and reducing burnout among frontline officers. He introduced new reporting protocols that helped commanders relay intelligence faster and more accurately, strengthening coordination between units. He also advocated for improved welfare for soldiers, pushing for better housing, medical support and logistics for families of troops serving far from home. Why he matters now is tied directly to Nigeria’s present security climate. With insurgency still active in pockets, banditry affecting multiple states, kidnapping rings expanding their operations, and communal conflicts emerging in several zones, Nigeria requires leadership that understands the realities of field operations. Musa’s nomination signals the government’s desire to blend administrative oversight with battlefield awareness. His supporters believe that his years of operational command will help bridge the gap between security planning in Abuja and execution in remote areas. Observers say he is stepping into a role that demands strategic clarity, firmness and empathy as Nigeria attempts to stabilize rural communities, strengthen border control and rebuild public trust. Should he be confirmed by the National Assembly, Christopher Musa will face immediate pressure to produce visible results, harmonise security agencies and communicate effectively with both military personnel and civilians living in danger.

President Bola Tinubu on Wednesday night declared a nationwide security emergency after holding a closed-door meeting with the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, the Chief of Defence Staff, General Christopher Musa, and the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun. This was inside the Presidential Villa in Abuja. The emergency directive followed a wave of coordinated kidnappings and violent attacks across several states, including recent mass abductions of schoolchildren and worshippers that have triggered widespread fear. The meeting took place at the Council Chamber at about 8:45 p.m., shortly after security agencies submitted reports detailing multiple attacks in Kaduna, Niger, Plateau and Benue. Also present at the briefing were the Director-General of the DSS, Yusuf Bichi, and the Commandant-General of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, Dr. Ahmed Audi. Senior aides from the Office of the Chief of Staff were also sighted arriving moments before the President entered the hall. During the meeting, the Inspector-General of Police briefed the President on the kidnapping of over 300 students and teachers during an attack on a government-owned secondary school earlier in the week. He also gave updates on the rescue of dozens of abducted girls taken from a boarding school in another incident. According to officials who were present, the President listened to separate presentations from the service chiefs about the state of security in the North-West and Middle Belt, including intelligence on the movement of armed groups operating in forest corridors. After reviewing the reports, President Tinubu announced the recruitment of 20,000 additional police personnel, to be deployed after accelerated training supervised jointly by the Police Academy and the military. He ordered all security units assigned to VIP protection to report for redeployment to areas affected by bandit activity. Addressing those in the room, the President said the country could not afford to “normalize disaster” and directed the armed forces to take immediate coordinated action to secure schools, churches and rural communities. Following the announcement, the National Security Adviser told journalists outside the Council Chamber that the President had instructed intelligence agencies to expand surveillance in border regions and forest clusters. Ribadu added that security formations would begin new joint operations involving the military, police and local guards under a central command structure. He said the President demanded weekly progress reports. Reactions began to emerge shortly after the announcement. Some members of the House of Representatives who were at the Villa for a separate engagement described the emergency order as "necessary but overdue." A civil society coalition monitoring the safety of schools said they hoped the measures would bring relief to displaced families still searching for missing relatives. Residents in affected communities also expressed cautious hope, saying only consistent action — not announcements — would restore confidence. The emergency declaration marks the most decisive step taken by the administration since the recent escalation of violence. For families grieving, for communities living in fear, and for a nation watching closely, the coming days will determine whether this directive brings real change or becomes another pledge waiting for results. GistVibes will continue tracking deployments, rescue updates and operational outcomes as the situation develops.

Governor Godwin Okpebholor has declared that he will resign from office if President Bola Tinubu loses the 2027 presidential election in Edo State, a bold statement that immediately stirred reactions across the political space. The governor made the remark during a stakeholders’ meeting with party leaders, insisting that the administration in the state must deliver overwhelming support to the president in the next general election. Okpebholor, who addressed party members in Benin City, said the performance of his government and the structures already being put in place should guarantee victory. According to him, any failure at the polls would be a clear sign that he no longer enjoys the trust of the people, and he would therefore have “no moral justification” to remain in office. He explained that the state is undergoing what he described as a new phase of developmental reforms which align with the vision of the current federal government. He added that the political partnership between his administration and the presidency must reflect at the ballot, stressing that he is prepared to put his career on the line. The governor also challenged party leaders across the 18 local government areas to intensify mobilisation efforts ahead of the 2027 election. He said the state must prove its loyalty through results, noting that the political climate in Edo requires unity, strategic communication and ground mobilisation. His statement has already sparked conversations among residents and political actors. While some supporters described his confidence as a sign of strong leadership, critics argued that tying his resignation to an election outcome is unnecessary and politically risky. Analysts believe the declaration may energize party members ahead of the next election cycle, but may also raise expectations that could put extra pressure on the governor moving forward. The 2027 election is still two years away, but political activities in Edo State have started gaining momentum, with parties restructuring and key figures making early moves. Governor Okpebholor’s pledge is the latest development in what is shaping up to be a highly competitive political season.

Former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan has been placed under military protection in Guinea-Bissau as the country slides into fresh political uncertainty, according to reliable diplomatic sources. Jonathan, who has been serving as a respected ECOWAS envoy, is now preparing to leave the troubled nation as tension deepens and fears of instability rise. The move comes after reports of institutional breakdowns, political disagreements, and heavy security deployment in parts of Bissau. For a country that has faced repeated political upheavals in the last two decades, these latest developments have again placed West Africa on alert. Why Jonathan Is in Guinea-Bissau   Jonathan has been playing a long-term diplomatic role in Guinea-Bissau, mediating electoral and governance issues on behalf of ECOWAS. His presence in the country has always been tied to efforts to stabilize its fragile democratic structures, especially during leadership disputes. But the current tension became serious enough for authorities to place him under military guard—an unusual sign that the situation on the ground had shifted from normal political disagreement to something more dangerous. Diplomatic insiders familiar with the situation say the protection was not due to any targeted threat against him specifically, but a precaution triggered by the fast-changing security environment. Rising Uncertainty Deepens in the Guinean Capital   In the last 48 hours, reports from Bissau indicate heightened movement of soldiers, disruptions in normal government operations, and increased concern among foreign diplomats. Some officials have been temporarily unable to operate freely as power struggles intensify between major political blocs. Residents have also reported confusion about who holds effective control of different government institutions. Though there is no confirmed coup, the atmosphere mirrors past episodes that eventually spiraled into full-blown military takeovers. For ECOWAS, the situation threatens to reopen old wounds in a region already strained by coups in Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, and attempted disruptions in Sierra Leone. Jonathan’s Safety and the Plan for His Exit   Multiple sources confirmed that Jonathan is safe and calm but has been advised to suspend all diplomatic engagements until the political climate becomes clearer. His planned departure from the country is now being organized in coordination with military authorities and ECOWAS officials. A senior West African diplomat described the move as “a necessary precaution for a respected statesman whose welfare is of strategic importance to the region.” While Jonathan remains guarded, other ECOWAS personnel are also being closely monitored, and some are expected to be relocated if the tension persists. Why This Matters for West Africa   Guinea-Bissau has long struggled with fragile governance, sudden changes in power, and deep institutional mistrust. Any instability there has ripple effects across the region: ECOWAS peace missions become harder to maintain. Neighboring countries face possible refugee movements. Regional elections and partnerships get disrupted. West Africa’s image as a democratic zone suffers further setbacks. With four coups in West Africa in recent years, ECOWAS is under pressure to prevent yet another collapse of democratic order. Jonathan’s presence in the country makes the situation even more sensitive. What Happens Next?   ECOWAS is expected to release an official communication soon as it tracks events in Bissau. Nigeria, which has historically played a major stabilizing role in the sub-region, is also monitoring developments closely. For now, Jonathan’s safety is secured, but the future of Guinea-Bissau remains uncertain. What began as political disagreement has now triggered concerns of a deeper crisis—one that could reshape West Africa’s fragile balance once again.

Nigeria’s political space is heating up once again, and one voice making waves is that of veteran journalist and publisher Dele Momodu. In a passionate public appeal, Momodu declared that Atiku Abubakar remains the most prepared opposition figure to lead Nigeria at this moment, urging other opposition leaders to close ranks and rally behind him. His message arrives at a time when many Nigerians are openly debating the future of leadership, the state of the economy, and the direction of the country. Momodu’s call is not simply political chatter—it is part of a broader conversation about unity, strategy, and Nigeria’s readiness for a new phase of national recovery. Why Dele Momodu Says Atiku Is “Best Prepared”   For Momodu, Atiku’s experience stands out above all else. He points to Atiku’s decades in public service, his long involvement in national politics, and his consistent presence in conversations around restructuring, economic reforms, and democratic strengthening. To Momodu, Atiku represents a steady hand—someone who has studied Nigeria’s problems up close, faced political battles, and built relationships across regions and political blocs. He argues that Atiku’s long-term visibility and understanding of governance make him “ready from day one,” especially in a country where leadership transitions often come with slow starts and steep learning curves. A Call for Unity Among Opposition Figures   Momodu’s strongest message, however, is directed at Nigeria’s fragmented opposition. He warns that division only strengthens the ruling class and weakens the chances of real change. He urges opposition leaders—across parties, movements, and ideological lines—to think beyond personal ambitions and focus on a united front that can challenge the status quo. To him, political unity is not just strategy. It is survival. Why the Opposition’s Next Move Matters for Nigeria   Nigeria is going through economic uncertainty, rising living costs, and public frustration. Young people are demanding better governance, transparency, and stability. Older citizens are calling for leadership that can restore national balance. In moments like this, divided opposition politics can slow progress and leave the country trapped between cycles of disappointment. Momodu argues that unity is not about crowning a single man—it is about building a team, a coalition, and a clear plan for national recovery. Atiku’s Position in Nigeria’s Political Landscape   Atiku Abubakar remains one of Nigeria’s most enduring political figures. Loved by many, criticised by some, but impossible to ignore. He has run for president multiple times, built a presence across all geopolitical zones, and stayed involved in national conversations long after election seasons ended. Whether people support him or not, Momodu believes this consistency shows a man who has prepared, studied, and remained ready. Momodu insists that in times of national uncertainty, experience cannot be replaced by emotion alone. What Nigerians Are Saying   Reactions to Momodu’s statement have been mixed. Many supporters applauded the call for unity, saying Nigeria needs leaders who can collaborate rather than compete endlessly. Others argued that opposition unity must include younger voices, new thinkers, and people with fresh visions. But most agree on one thing: Nigeria cannot afford another cycle of scattered opposition politics and half-hearted alliances. Whether Nigerians accept Atiku as the standard-bearer or choose a different figure, the pressure to unite has never been stronger. The Road Ahead   Momodu’s statement has opened a fresh chapter in political debate. It places pressure on opposition leaders to reconsider their strategies, rebuild bridges, and place national interest above rivalry. For citizens, it is another reminder that the 2027 political stage is already being shaped—quietly, loudly, and everywhere in between.

Nigeria has firmly rejected claims that there has been a legitimate change of government in Guinea-Bissau, describing the recent military actions in the country as an unconstitutional attempt to seize power. In a strongly worded statement issued in Abuja, the Federal Government said it received the news of the attempted military overthrow with “profound dismay and deep concern,” warning that any interruption of constitutional rule in the West African state is unacceptable. The statement, released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, stressed that Nigeria does not recognize any military-led change of government and stands fully behind the democratic process in Guinea-Bissau. Nigeria’s Position on the Crisis According to the statement, the Federal Government condemned the insurrection “in the strongest possible terms,” stressing that such actions undermine years of democratic progress in the region. Nigeria described the military action as: A violation of ECOWAS protocols A direct attack on democratic governance A dangerous move capable of destabilizing the entire West African neighbourhood The government insisted that power must never change hands through unconstitutional means, adding that the will of the people of Guinea-Bissau must be respected without interference. Call for Restoration of Constitutional Order   Nigeria called for the immediate and unconditional return to democratic rule in Guinea-Bissau. The statement also demanded: Safety and protection for all detained officials Respect for democratic institutions Safe movement for election observers still in the country Nigeria said it “stands in solidarity with the people of Guinea-Bissau,” emphasizing that only dialogue, restraint, and respect for electoral processes can restore peace. Support for ECOWAS and Regional Stability   The Federal Government reaffirmed its alignment with ECOWAS principles, noting that the military uprising directly contradicts the regional protocol on democracy and good governance. By condemning the attempted takeover, Nigeria is sending a wider message: West Africa cannot afford recurring coups that threaten the region’s stability, security, and credibility. Looking Ahead   With tensions rising in Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria says it will continue monitoring developments and working with regional partners to ensure democracy prevails. The statement ended with a renewed call for all actors in Guinea-Bissau to respect the will of the people, maintain peace, and allow the electoral process to conclude transparently.